<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mullen.com &#187; metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mullen.com/tag/metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mullen.com</link>
	<description>The latest info from Mullen Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Performance accountability for upper-funnel campaigns</title>
		<link>http://www.mullen.com/2009/09/performance-accountability-for-upper-funnel-campaigns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mullen.com/2009/09/performance-accountability-for-upper-funnel-campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Murdough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaHUB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand consideration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upper-funnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web measurement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mullen.com/?p=2121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great attributes of digital marketing campaigns are the inherent track-ability of the Web and the performance transparency possible by tying explicit business measures such as leads or transactions resulting from a digital media investment. But, sometimes campaigns are not focused on direct response, but rather influencing upper-funnel stages such as awareness and consideration.  When this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great attributes of digital marketing campaigns are the inherent track-ability of the Web and the performance transparency possible by tying explicit business measures such as leads or transactions resulting from a digital media investment.</p>
<p>But, sometimes campaigns are not focused on direct response, but rather influencing upper-funnel stages such as awareness and consideration.  When this is the case, a best practice is to conduct pre- vs. post-campaign brand survey studies, but we can also utilize an audience engagement construct based on online behaviors that act as proxies for awareness and/ or consideration and be leading indicators of future economic value (leads, transactions).</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2122" src="http://www.mullen.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Engagement-Score-Construct.png" alt="Engagement Score Construct" width="593" height="242" /></p>
<p>There are a number of behaviors that can make up an engagement score – rich-media ad interactions (window expansions, video plays, utilizations such as calculators or games), homepage visitation (especially via post-impression response<sup>†</sup>), landing page visitation, store/ branch locater activity, consumption of high-value content (reinforcing campaign messages), etc.</p>
<p>However, not all of these behavioral interactions are equally valuable depending upon campaign goals and the interaction’s respective place in the purchase funnel – visiting store locater results pages is an intuitively stronger indicator of purchase intent likelihood than visiting the campaign landing page or even the brand homepage or ad unit interactions.</p>
<p>To account for this differential value of interactions, each behavior can be weighted, respectively, to reflect each one’s relative value (say, on a scale from 0-2, or whatever is appropriate for the specific brand’s business).</p>
<p>Once a methodology is established, the engagement score can be utilized as the basis for gauging campaign responsiveness (via engagement yield = engagement score/ ad impressions) as well as financial efficiency (via cost per engagement = media cost/ engagement score) to guide campaign optimization decisions.</p>
<p>So, the next time, your client has a digital campaign focused on influencing upper-funnel activities, and you don’t have the time, funds, or interest in formally evaluating brand awareness and consideration measures from a brand survey study, consider behavioral engagement as a good, easily available success proxy.</p>
<p>What experiences have you had in using online behavior measures as gauges of success for upper-funnel digital campaigns…?  What else would you consider…?</p>
<p><sup>†</sup>Post-impression (PI) response represents the target audience being exposed to online display advertising (OLA), not clicking on the ad (banner), but at a later time visiting the brand’s site and exhibiting the campaign’s goal behaviors (homepage visit, priority content consumption, order submission, etc.).  PI response typically accounts for 60-90% of total campaign response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mullen.com/2009/09/performance-accountability-for-upper-funnel-campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
