<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mullen.com &#187; Doritos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mullen.com/tag/doritos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mullen.com</link>
	<description>The latest info from Mullen Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to win the BrandBowl</title>
		<link>http://www.mullen.com/2010/02/how-to-win-the-brandbowl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mullen.com/2010/02/how-to-win-the-brandbowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Parcell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BrandBowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BrandBowl2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doritos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focus on the Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mulllen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radian6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Tebow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mullen.com/?p=3864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doritos, Google and Focus on the Family. They were the three brands left standing on the podium at the conclusion of BrandBowl2010. Why you ask? Isn’t it obvious, I say? Simplicity. Buzz. And dialogue. Of course, we all know pulling off effective campaigns is a lot harder than it looks. It’s much easier to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3903" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a rel="lightbox-album" href="http://www.mullen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Doritos_kid.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3903" title="Doritos_kid" src="http://www.mullen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Doritos_kid-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Doritos - &quot;Keep your hands off my Mama!&quot;</p></div>
<p>Doritos, Google and Focus on the Family.</p>
<p>They were the three brands left standing on the podium at the conclusion of <a href="http://brandbowl2010.com" target="_blank">BrandBowl2010</a>. Why you ask? Isn’t it obvious, I say? Simplicity. Buzz. And dialogue.</p>
<p>Of course, we all know pulling off effective campaigns is a lot harder than it looks. It’s much easier to be an armchair quarterback, to write blog posts about how successful brands follow simple marketing rules, and then state those rules for all to see.</p>
<p>Boy, this armchair sure is comfy.</p>
<h2>1) Production dollars don’t help you stand out at the Super Bowl.</h2>
<p>In fact, they might help you blend in.</p>
<p>How do you squeeze your message through the spectacle that is the Super Bowl? How do you break through all of the hype, through the blaring graphics, the laser shows, the celebrities, the boatloads of slickly produced, over-the-top spots?</p>
<p>You chill out.</p>
<p>Google reused their elegant &#8220;Parisian Love” spot from their <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/SearchStories" target="_blank">Search Stories</a> campaign. It was nothing more than a simple screencast of an enthralling dialogue-free story. You (yes, you!) can purchase a license for <a href="http://www.ambrosiasw.com/utilities/snapzprox/" target="_blank">Snapz Pro</a> for $69, get yourself some royalty-free music and in an hour produce something similar yourself. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io5mvdXvQQ0" rel="shadowbox[post-3864];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank">Gene Simmons—and his midget</a>—can eat their hearts out.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nnsSUqgkDwU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nnsSUqgkDwU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<h2>2) Pre-game buzz is worth more than any thirty-second spot.</h2>
<p>Set against a white seamless backdrop, Focus on the Family had Pam Tebow talk<a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone/watch#50032762"> </a>about her difficult pregnancy. Then her son, 2007 Heisman Trophy winning Tim Tebow, tackles her to the ground. Goofy smiles and heart-warming feelings ensue. Not a particularly memorable spot in and of itself.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="512" height="296" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.hulu.com/edp/http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ehulu%2Ecom%2F/embed/M6ugcmYtmFF-r2GQp5kr1w" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="296" src="http://www.hulu.com/edp/http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ehulu%2Ecom%2F/embed/M6ugcmYtmFF-r2GQp5kr1w" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>But <a href="http://www.focusonthefamily.com/" target="_blank">Focus on the Family</a> got their $2.6-million-dollar-buy worth before Drew Brees brushed his teeth Sunday morning. According to the BrandBowl, Focus on Family was far and away the most tweeted about brand among Super Bowl advertisers in the days leading up to the big game. That the actual spot turned out to be something of a non-event didn’t matter.</p>
<h2>3) Mix the first two rules, add a dash of dialogue with your consumers, and you’ll win the BrandBowl!</h2>
<p>Doritos&#8217; &#8220;<a href="http://www.crashthesuperbowl.com/" target="_blank">Crash the Super Bowl</a>&#8221; campaign continued the brilliant crowdsourcing effort they&#8217;ve been running for three years now. It eschews top production values, in favor of building buzz and a community of avid followers in the months (and years, really) leading up to the game. It lets the people take control of the brand. The result is hilarious, simple, stand-out spots that get tweeted about in droves, make Doritos feel like a contemporary brand and makes them winners of the Brand Bowl.</p>
<p><em>Acknowledgment: this article was</em> <em>written with contributions from Andy Schneider.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mullen.com/2010/02/how-to-win-the-brandbowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doritos wins the BrandBowl. Budweiser Select 55 is biggest loser.</title>
		<link>http://www.mullen.com/2010/02/doritos-wins-the-brandbowl-budweiser-select-55-is-biggest-loser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mullen.com/2010/02/doritos-wins-the-brandbowl-budweiser-select-55-is-biggest-loser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Swaebe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BrandBowl2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doritos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focus on Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl commercials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mullen.com/?p=3810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the 63,000+ Twitter users whose comments were captured in BrandBowl2010, Doritos was the most effective brand to advertise on the Super Bowl telecast on CBS this year. Budweiser Select55 was the least effective brand. Mullen, and Radian6, a leader in social media measurement, created BrandBowl2010, a Twitter/Super Bowl experience that combined tweeting, ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_3812" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 204px"><a rel="lightbox-album" href="http://www.mullen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/BrandBowlWinnerslarge.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3812" title="BrandBowlWinners(large)" src="http://www.mullen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/BrandBowlWinnerslarge-194x300.jpg" alt="" width="194" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">BrandBowl2010 Winners</p></div>
<p>According to the 63,000+ Twitter users whose comments were captured in <a href="http://brandbowl2010.com/" target="_blank"><em>BrandBowl2010</em></a>, <a href="http://www.crashthesuperbowl.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Doritos</strong></a> was the most effective brand to advertise on the Super Bowl telecast on CBS this year. <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGwAgHd12js" rel="shadowbox[post-3810];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank">Budweiser Select55</a> </strong>was the least effective brand<strong>. </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Mullen, and <a href="http://www.radian6.com/" target="_blank">Radian6</a>, a leader in social media measurement, created <a href="http://brandbowl2010.com/" target="_blank"><em>BrandBowl2010</em></a>, a Twitter/Super Bowl experience that combined tweeting, ad reviews and a host of metrics to let viewers generate and view real time ratings of the TV commercials that ran on the big game.</p>
<p>The results were determined from a total of 98,656 Tweets collected at BrandBowl2010. The site provided an overall ranking of the brands advertising on the game based on a composite score that takes into consideration both volume of tweets and sentiment (positive or negative). <em> </em></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>TOP SCORERS</strong><br />
When all was said and done, the top three brands were Doritos, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH5RRLgqzmI" rel="shadowbox[post-3810];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank"><strong>Google</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqReTDJSdhE" rel="shadowbox[post-3810];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank"><strong>Focus on the Family</strong></a>. Doritos won the title by virtue of dominating the sheer volume of tweets. That was enough to keep them ahead of Google, which had a higher percentage of positive tweets.</p>
<p><strong>MOST POPULAR</strong><br />
The most popular brands at the BrandBowl were <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmrTDZy3f2M" rel="shadowbox[post-3810];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank"><strong>McDonald’s</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io5mvdXvQQ0" rel="shadowbox[post-3810];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank"><strong>Dr. Pepper</strong></a>. Interestingly, neither of these brands had the sheer number of tweets to break into BrandBowl’s top ten—but the tweets about these brands were overwhelmingly positive.</p>
<p><strong>MOST VOLUME</strong><br />
Again, the top three brands were Doritos, Google and Focus on the Family. These brands gapped the rest of the field in terms of volume of tweets, which dropped off sharply after the top three. <strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Free creative for Budweiser Select55</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Mullen is offering Budweiser Select55<strong>, </strong>the last place finisher in BrandBowl2010,<strong> </strong>free creative services to make a better Super Bowl commercial next year. Mullen has produced four Super Bowl commercials in the past, including the Monster.com spot <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9o1wni3N5s" rel="shadowbox[post-3810];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank">When I Grow Up</a></em>, which many ad critics consider among the best Super Bowl spots of all time.</p>
<p>“Clearly no one wants to come in last place,” said <a href="http://twitter.com/Edwardboches" target="_blank">Edward Boches</a>, chief creative officer at Mullen. “So to ease the pain, we’ve made a commitment to recommend, for free, to the losing brand, creative ideas for next year. Perhaps we’ll even crowdsource those ideas, asking the entire social media community to join us in offering up free recommendations.”</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RGwAgHd12js&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RGwAgHd12js&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em><strong>The Top Ten Most Effective Brands on BrandBowl2010</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>1. </strong>Doritos <strong><br />
2. </strong>Google<strong><br />
3. </strong>Focus On Family<strong><br />
4. </strong>Snickers: <strong><br />
5. </strong>Budweiser<strong><br />
6. </strong>Bud Light<strong><br />
7. </strong>Hyundai<strong><br />
8. </strong>Kia<strong><br />
9. </strong>GoDaddy<strong><br />
10. </strong>Coca-Cola<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>The Five Least Effective Brands on BrandBowl2010</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>1. </strong>Budweiser Select55<strong><br />
2. </strong>Michelob Ultra<strong><br />
3. </strong>Teleflora<strong><br />
4. </strong>Honda<strong><br />
5. </strong>Diamond Foods’ – Pop Secret</p>
<p>The success of Brandbowl is due not only to all the people at Mullen and Radian6 who built  it, but to many people in the social media community who helped promote it: <a href="http://twitter.com/BbhLabs" target="_blank"> @bbhlabs</a>,  <a href="http://twitter.com/Bigspaceship" target="_blank">@bigspaceship</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/RGA" target="_blank">@rga</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/eProulx" target="_blank">@erproulx</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/benkunz" target="_blank">@benkunz</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/Schwartzie14" target="_blank">@schwartzie14</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/stevehall" target="_blank">@stevehall</a>,  <a href="http://twitter.com/KenWheaton" target="_blank">@kenwheaton</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/lvanderpool" target="_blank">@lvanderpool </a>and dozens of others.   That alone is a reminder of the worth of having a social network and a  community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mullen.com/2010/02/doritos-wins-the-brandbowl-budweiser-select-55-is-biggest-loser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
